sharpestscalpel: (Scar)
[personal profile] sharpestscalpel
Got a message from 'Fleet command today, looking for Pike and what the hell is he doing and blah blah Empire business blah.

Uhura handled it before Chekov could flub it. Those two are turning into a dangerous pair. I've had three castrations to, well, it ain't like you can re-attach that shit when it's been pulverized. Chekov does some dirty fucking work, man. Good kid.

Other than that, ain't nothing going down. I figured we'd be seeing hell and weird shit after that whole scene in the brig but Enterprise has been quiet lately and Kirk is hanging on just as tight as he can to keeping his breathing and his beating fucking heart inside his fucking body.

Time to bust out some music, I think. Make the nurses dance a bit. It ain't easy to shake your fucking ass to Tom Waits but that ain't exactly my fucking problem, now is it?

Date: 2010-01-01 12:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] science-blues.livejournal.com
An appreciable sentiment.

Though we have not yet engaged in a meal together. Is that not a human social convention?

Date: 2010-01-01 12:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] canadianbill.livejournal.com
Thank you.

...I didn't mean like that. I thought you only liked girls? Unless I was actually right all along, and all women secretly do need a man to satisfy them properly.

Date: 2010-01-01 12:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] science-blues.livejournal.com
In the event that I was unclear, the above reply is indicative of my general disregard for your fallacious statement and the implications behind it. Though I do not begrudge you this belief, its inaccuracy would be moderately offensive, were I capable of being offended.

I have never left a woman anything less than properly satisfied.

Date: 2010-01-01 12:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] canadianbill.livejournal.com
...no, I think that time your meaning was clear.

I am glad you're not capable of being offended, because I didn't mean to offend you. I am sure you are amazing in bed. I'm just ignorant. It comes of being a man, I'm sure.

Date: 2010-01-01 12:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] science-blues.livejournal.com
Gender and ignorance are not related, specifically, unless there is a historical human social hindrance I am unaware of.

But do not be concerned, Bill Shatner, ignorance is a perpetual state experienced by all beings. Information is all that is required to correct any specific presentation of it.

Date: 2010-01-01 12:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] canadianbill.livejournal.com
You'll have to show me some time. I'm always eager to learn.

Date: 2010-01-01 12:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] science-blues.livejournal.com
Indeed. Should an opportunity present itself, I will notify you.


(OOC - You think she's joking.)

Date: 2010-01-01 12:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] canadianbill.livejournal.com
I look forward to it!

{OOC - you know, I don't? ;) ]

Date: 2010-01-01 12:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] len-not-spock.livejournal.com
I'd argue that ignorance in this instance is at least on some level linked with male priviledge.

Profile

sharpestscalpel: (Default)
sharpestscalpel

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
23 45678
91011 12131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 26th, 2026 07:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios